* If you haven't already done so, be sure to sign up for our FREE Report & FREE Updates List at bottom of page. *
*** Prominent Putin-Hating 'Usual Suspect' Still Promoting War ***
|
|
-
FEBRUARY 24, 2023
NY Times: Putin and the Right’s Tough-Guy Problem
BY PAUL KRUGMAN
NY Times: Putin and the Right’s Tough-Guy Problem
BY PAUL KRUGMAN
REBUTTAL BY
The despicable Nobel Prize Winning" ™ Fake Economist Paul Krugman (cough cough) is one of the most senior propagandists at the "paper of record" and a ubiquitous TV gadfly. The odious little rodent's psychotic and slanderous hatred for Vladimir Putin tells us all we need to know about Russia's leader -- specifically, that he is a good and great man who poses an existential threat to (((their))) New World Order.
In this propaganda piece, this sneaky sniveling specimen of Satanic scum -- this juvenile Jewish joker -- this heckling Hebrew hyena vomits out the usual anti-Russian calumnies for his legions of stupid and vapid groupies to gulp down like mother's milk. Hazmat suits and hip waders on, boys and girls -- into Krugman's crap-pool we go for some "debunking" clean-up work.
In this propaganda piece, this sneaky sniveling specimen of Satanic scum -- this juvenile Jewish joker -- this heckling Hebrew hyena vomits out the usual anti-Russian calumnies for his legions of stupid and vapid groupies to gulp down like mother's milk. Hazmat suits and hip waders on, boys and girls -- into Krugman's crap-pool we go for some "debunking" clean-up work.
2020: Perverted Paulie -- in an obvious attempt to get out ahead of the story -- tweeted out that QAnon people may have been responsible for downloading child pornography onto his computer. --- Sure Paulie, sure.
Krugman's diatribe of deceit contains far too many lies to rebut within the limits of the pithiness which ANYT readers prefer. This concise analysis will therefore be limited to only the first three sentences of his column - which are more than enough because this exceptional deceiver has the ability to pack multiple lies into one sentence. It's really quite extraordinary.
Krugman: A democracy (he means the Ukraine) ....
Rebuttal: The Jukraine has NOT been a "democracy" since its elected leader was overthrown by a violent CIA-Mossad coup in 2014 and the Russia-friendly parties banned. Putrid Paulie KNOWS this but deceitfully describes the Jew Oligarch-installed Kiev gangster state as a "democracy" anyway.
Krugman: ....imperfect, as all nations are....
Rebuttal: Note the liar's "limited hangout" trick here. Krugman brushes aside the astonishing corruption and violence of the Jukraine government with the watered-down adjective "imperfect."
Krugman: ... but aspiring to be part of the free world ....
Rebuttal: "The free world" ™ is Globo-Judeo-speak for the captive collection of states under the firm grip of the NWO-NATO-EU Axis-of-Evil. This would also include the whored-out political establishments of Taiwan, Japan, Australia & New Zealand. What Krugman is really telling us is that the NWO wants Ukraine fully integrated into "the free world ™" --- which isn't "free" at all.
Krugman: ... is invaded by its much larger neighbor,....
Rebuttal: You know who was first "invaded by a much larger neighbor," Krugman? The Russian-speaking Republics of Luhansk and Donestsk were .... by the Ukraine! None of the libelous liars-by-omission in the Judenpresse ever mention the 8-year-long oppression of the Donbas republics though.
Krugman: ... a vicious dictatorship .......
Rebuttal: How is Russia a "vicious dictatorship?" Putin was not only popularly elected, but by very wide margins.
Krugman: .... that commits mass atrocities.
Rebuttal: No! It's the Ukrainian ultras who have been merciless towards civilians. The Russian troops are considered as liberators by the Russian Eastern Ukrainians. Why would the Russians commit "atrocities" against their own supporters?
Count em'! That make SIX whopper lies embedded in Krugman's opening sentence alone! Now, on to Sentence #2.
Krugman: Defying the odds, the democracy .....
Rebuttal: Krugman repeats the lie about Ukrainian "democracy." Skilled liars understand the importance of repetition.
Krugman: .... beats back an attack most people expected to succeed in a matter of days....
Rebuttal: .... The Ukrainian ultras beat back nothing. Russia has long had control of the Eastern regions and has no interest in advancing westward. The fact that Putin has no further territorial objectives is being deliberately misrepresented as being "beaten back."
Krugman: ..... then holds the line .....
Rebuttal: ..... Ukraine is "holding the line" because Putin has no desire to ever cross the line and take Kiev!
Krugman: .... and even regains ground over the months of brutal fighting that follow.
Rebuttal: From neutral foreign sources and former UN Weapons Inspector Scott Ritter, all data points to a Russian rout with the Donbas region firmly under total Russian control now.
That makes FOUR additional reality-inverting falsehoods in sentence #2. Let's do Sentence #3.
Krugman: How can any American, a citizen of a nation that holds itself up as a beacon of freedom, not be rooting for Ukraine in this war?
Rebuttal: Given the TEN demonstrable deceptions vomited out in the first two sentences alone -- and our truthful refutations of those monstrous mendacities -- perhaps a better, subtly tweaked question would be: How can any American, a citizen of a nation that holds itself up as a beacon of freedom, not be rooting for the Donbas republics and their Russian protectors in this war?
Three sentences of this slandering shyster's sleaze are enough. If your favorite raving and ranting, lie-allergic reporter here has to paste and rebut the entire article -- I'll have a bloody heart attack! It's that bad.
|
|
1. 2014: The insane John McStain provoked pain in the Ukraine. // 2. The "protests" turned violent, "democracy" was destroyed.
Reality vs. selectively edited narrative: Mamma Bear Russia protects her Luhansk & Dotesk cubs.
|
PBS July 2022
AP News January 2023
Tribune of India // February 2023
|
Russia is in control and the liberated republics will never go back. Krugman KNOWS this, but instead of "rooting" for an end to the war, he's "rooting for Ukraine."
Krugman's verbal ability to twist reality is as breathtaking and formidable to behold in TV speech as it is in print. His "shtick" (Yiddish for act or gimmick) brings to mind an observation which The Great One (that's Hitler for you newbies & normies) once made about such Satanic specimens of sophistry. Excerpts from Mein Kampf:
"The more I debated with them the more familiar I became with their argumentative tactics. At the outset they counted upon the stupidity of their opponents, but when they got so entangled that they could not find a way out they played the trick of acting as innocent simpletons. Should they fail, in spite of their tricks of logic, they acted as if they could not understand the counter arguments and bolted away to another field of discussion. They would lay down truisms and platitudes; and, if you accepted these, then they were applied to other problems and matters of an essentially different nature from the original theme. If you faced them with this point they would escape again, and you could not bring them to make any precise statement. Whenever one tried to get a firm grip on any of these apostles one's hand grasped only jelly and slime which slipped through the fingers and combined again into a solid mass a moment afterwards.
I found it extremely difficult myself to be a match for the dialectical perfidy of that race. How futile it was to try to win over such people with argument, seeing that their very mouths distorted the truth, disowning the very words they had just used and adopting them again a few moments afterwards to serve their own ends in the argument!
Sometimes I was dumbfounded. I do not know what amazed me the more--the abundance of their verbiage or the artful way in which they dressed up their falsehoods. I gradually came to hate them."
*
Yep. That's Krugman. Tell it, Great One. Tell it!
|
|
|
1. A century after publication, his "Kampf" (struggle) remains our struggle. // 2 & 3. Krugman looks familiar, don't he?
|
|
Boobus Americanus 1: I read a column by Paul Krugman in the New York Times today. He still has hope that Ukraine can win.
Boobus Americanus 2: I stand with Ukraine.
*
St Sugar: It's over, Boobuss.
Editor: All that's left is the made-for-TV finale, which may involve Trump as the peace-broker.
MIKE'S BANNED BOOKS & PDFs
Boobus Americanus 2: I stand with Ukraine.
*
St Sugar: It's over, Boobuss.
Editor: All that's left is the made-for-TV finale, which may involve Trump as the peace-broker.
MIKE'S BANNED BOOKS & PDFs
*************
AUTO-MONTHLY DONOR / SUBSCRIBER ($5 monthly min.) OR 1-TIME OPTIONS
YOU GET ALL 24 PDF BOOKS
PLUS the "almost-daily' Anti-NY Times
**************
AUTO-MONTHLY DONOR / SUBSCRIBER ($5 monthly min.) OR 1-TIME OPTIONS
YOU GET ALL 24 PDF BOOKS
PLUS the "almost-daily' Anti-NY Times
**************
* Allow a few daytime hours (USA EST time) to receive the pdf links.
CLICK IMAGE BELOW & 'SIGN UP' SECURELY
*Be sure to submit your e-mail address there
*Be sure to submit your e-mail address there
*****
For 1-Time Online Donation Option, go to DONATE PAGE
To send a check / MO or cash by mail: Payable to:
PASCAL PUBLICATIONS, P.O. BOX 804, SADDLE BROOK, NJ 07663
For 1-Time Online Donation Option, go to DONATE PAGE
To send a check / MO or cash by mail: Payable to:
PASCAL PUBLICATIONS, P.O. BOX 804, SADDLE BROOK, NJ 07663
