Mint Condition
|
New Hitler Postage Stamps Are Here! LESS RARE / MORE AFFORDABLE ISSUE *** Only 11 Available *** FIRST COME, FIRST SERVED! HERE |
Slimes Caption: "Some days call for jeans and sneakers," said Brendan Dunlap, a substitute teacher seen here in the Mission District of San Francisco. "Some days, a little sundress feels right."
JUNE 10, 2021
NY Times: The Boys in Their Summer Dresses
Gender fluidity enters its next phase as men increasingly step out in skirts and frocks.
NY Times: The Boys in Their Summer Dresses
Gender fluidity enters its next phase as men increasingly step out in skirts and frocks.
REBUTTAL BY
One needn't be a "boomer" to recall the "good old days" when sodomites were still considered freaks and the idea of "gay marriage" was so repulsive that even 2008 Demonrat candidates Obongo (a homo) & Killary (a lesbo) were compelled to voice their disapproval of the legal abomination. And now, thanks to the relentless pushing of the Fake News and Hollyweird, more than half of Americans (including a decent percentage of "conservatives") support this new "right" to spit in the face of the Eternal Creator.
One needn't even be a "millennial" to recall the recent time when "transgenders" were openly mocked as "trannies" and regarded, even by liberal psychiatrists, as mental cases. And now, thanks again to the relentless pushing of the Fake News and Hollyweird, more and more pathetic parents are signing off on hormone blockers and genital mutilation for a confused child.
So, boys and girls, now that the "paper of record" has, for the first time as far as we can tell, given its demonic and highly coveted blessing for non-tranny / non-gay men to wear dresses, we laugh at our own peril if we dismiss this trend as something that will never catch-on with otherwise seemingly "normal" men and boys.
One needn't even be a "millennial" to recall the recent time when "transgenders" were openly mocked as "trannies" and regarded, even by liberal psychiatrists, as mental cases. And now, thanks again to the relentless pushing of the Fake News and Hollyweird, more and more pathetic parents are signing off on hormone blockers and genital mutilation for a confused child.
So, boys and girls, now that the "paper of record" has, for the first time as far as we can tell, given its demonic and highly coveted blessing for non-tranny / non-gay men to wear dresses, we laugh at our own peril if we dismiss this trend as something that will never catch-on with otherwise seemingly "normal" men and boys.
|
|
|
Slimes Images & Captions from the article: 1. Lil Nas X (singer) turned up for “The Tonight Show” last month in a tartan kilt. // 2. Kid Cudi performed on “Saturday Night Live” in April wearing a floral dress // 3. For his maiden outing as a cover boy for Vogue, Harry Styles (English singer and actor) wore a dress from Gucci.
The article explains that more and more "straight" men are "experimenting" with women's clothing:
"It seems fairly unlikely that when Irwin Shaw wrote “The Girls in Their Summer Dresses,” his classic paean to “a million wonderful women, all over the city,” drifting along the pavement as warm breezes tugged at their hems, he could have envisioned a day when those “girls” would as likely be men. .... To the delighted surprise of at least one observer, a considerable number of us apparently used the time in confinement to rethink some shibboleths (outmoded customs) about who gets to wear what.
Khoa Sinclair, for instance, treated lockdown as a time of experimentation, a chance to push a style already liberated from rigid binary conventions into the realm of “next-level femininity.” “For the longest time, people were so stuck on being one way or the other,” Mx. Sinclair said, referring to waning gendered dress codes. “Queer people have been playing with this for a long time. But now you see a lot of guys in dresses that don’t identify as all that feminine.”
As it is with all things that are God-ordained and written into our hearts (instinct) and minds (logic), the Satanic Left's new manufactured argument in favor of "waning gendered dress codes" is that such codes were always "artificial social constructs." "Who says boys shouldn't wear dresses? Where is it written? Throughout the ages, matters of fashions and styles have always been relative, have they not? Don't the manly Scottish and Irish wear kilts when they play their bagpipes? Would you call them girly boys? What's the harm in it?"
The answer to this Satanic sophistry may, at first, elude its targeted and confused victim -- especially if the "boys in summer dresses" are not homosexual and don't otherwise act feminine. But there is indeed plenty wrong with it -- and plenty dangerous.
|
|
Scottish actor and real life "macho man" (recently deceased) Sean Connery (Original James Bond) in traditional kilt. The Marxist sophists will use this type of argument to promote "boys in summer dresses."
|
|
1. Ignorant Swedish high school kids mock tradition and sanity by dressing as the opposite sex for their class photo // 2. Pussified Taiwanese boys can wear skirts to school now.
The most recognizable danger of "gender fluid" dressing for "straight" boys and men is that it carries with it the obvious potential for being a "gateway drug" into the dark world of gender confusion, tranniedom and sodomy. After an otherwise seemingly masculine boy or young man indulges that first temptation to dress "like a woman," how far can he be from wanting to have private parts like a women? Or, pardon the wee bit of vulgarity here --- desiring to take it like a woman? And what about the very little children seeing this abomination? What seeds are being planted in their fertile imaginations?
The "artificial social construct" / "Scots wear kilts" argument is a bit trickier to counter because fashions and trends do indeed harmlessly "evolve" with the times. The rugged Viking sailors and warriors wore their hair long and even in braids. The feared legionaries of Rome wore skirts. European nobles and American colonists sometimes wore wigs or ponytails. In some cultures, bearded men are the norm and shaving is considered vanity. Etc. etc. etc.
However, none of that changes the fact that in every social grouping that has ever existed -- ranging from primitive tribes to advanced civilizations -- the little boys and the little girls were, in accordance with their true natures, separated and reared differently ---- as the grown men and women, in accordance with their true natures, were expected to act differently. Because there is clearly nothing "artificial" about the biological and psychological differences between the sexes -- the differences in learned behaviors such as dress, though they may vary greatly from culture to culture and century to century, are not "artificial social constructs" -- just varying manifestations of the timeless wisdom behind keeping the sexes opposite and apart, and thus compatible as natural complements to each other. The warriors of Scotland may have worn kilts -- but the womenfolk did not!
The challenging of societal norms solely for the provocative purpose of challenging societal norms isn't "progress," -- it is reckless childishness (guided by elites who know exactly what they are doing to us). To destroy gender differences is to destroy the natural male-female dynamic that is the foundation of healthy relationships, marriages and families, and hence, civilization itself. And that is why the "usual suspects" want our sons to start wearing summer dresses.
Africans Asians Europeans
The boys
The girls
|
The boys
The girls
|
The boys
The girls
|
From Africa to Asia to Europe --- Vastly different cultures, different continents, different eras, different styles --- yet the eternal natural principle of separate codes of dress and conduct for the sexes is common to all pre-Marxified peoples. Ironically, it is the "gender fluid" dress code which represents an "artificial social construct."
|
|
Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times today that more and more straight men are wearing dresses now.
Boobus Americanus 2: Oh well. Fashions change from century to century.
Boobus Americanus 2: Oh well. Fashions change from century to century.
***
St. Sugar: But our God-written DNA coding doess not, Boobuss!
Editor: Youse animals don't have these gender confusion issues.
* Share article using Facebook icon -- if it's not below, you can find it at top of page
DONATIONS
MIKE'S BANNED BOOKS & PDFS
St. Sugar: But our God-written DNA coding doess not, Boobuss!
Editor: Youse animals don't have these gender confusion issues.
* Share article using Facebook icon -- if it's not below, you can find it at top of page
DONATIONS
MIKE'S BANNED BOOKS & PDFS
Mint Condition
|
New Hitler Postage Stamps Are Here! LESS RARE / MORE AFFORDABLE ISSUE *** Only 11 Available *** FIRST COME, FIRST SERVED! HERE |
Post the link for this page to your FaceBook. Simply copy address below ...
realhistorychan.com/anyt-06102021.html
... then click on the F icon and post to your page -- Thanks.
realhistorychan.com/anyt-06102021.html
... then click on the F icon and post to your page -- Thanks.
*************
AUTO-MONTHLY DONOR / SUBSCRIBER ($5 monthly min.) OR 1-TIME OPTIONS
YOU GET ALL 24 PDF BOOKS
PLUS the "almost-daily' Anti-NY Times
**************
AUTO-MONTHLY DONOR / SUBSCRIBER ($5 monthly min.) OR 1-TIME OPTIONS
YOU GET ALL 24 PDF BOOKS
PLUS the "almost-daily' Anti-NY Times
**************
* Allow a few daytime hours (USA EST time) to receive the pdf links.
CLICK IMAGE BELOW & 'SIGN UP' SECURELY
* Be sure to enter e-mail there when prompted.
* Be sure to enter e-mail there when prompted.
*****
For 1-Time Online Donation Option, go to DONATE PAGE
To send a check / MO or cash by mail: Payable to:
PASCAL PUBLICATIONS, P.O. BOX 804, SADDLE BROOK, NJ 07663
For 1-Time Online Donation Option, go to DONATE PAGE
To send a check / MO or cash by mail: Payable to:
PASCAL PUBLICATIONS, P.O. BOX 804, SADDLE BROOK, NJ 07663
