Tweet

* If you haven't already done so, be sure to sign up for our FREE Report & FREE Updates List at bottom of page.

*

The Marxist Destruction of Womanhood


By Mike King

"The October Revolution inscribed on its banner the emancipation of womankind and created the most progressive legislation in history on marriage and the family. Genuine emancipation of women is inconceivable without the destruction of the petty-bourgeois economic family unit.

Guided by its conservative instinct, the bureaucracy has taken alarm at the 'disintegration' of the family. It began singing praise to the family supper and the laundry, that is, the household slavery of woman. To cap it all, the bureaucracy has restored criminal punishment for abortions, officially returning women to the status of pack animals."

-- Bolshevik Leon Trotsky, from exile, 1938 -- lamenting the return of social conservationism regarding women taking place under Stalin.

The New York Slimes (February 27, 2020):

Berlin Drops Hindenburg’s Honorary Title for his Role in Nazis’ Rise:
State government strikes former president off list, citing his 1933 act of appointing Hitler as chancellor.

In this mad, mad, mad Marxist-Trotskyite world of ours -- whenever a female police officer or firefighter is killed in the line of duty -- rather than societal soul-searching taking place, we instead have to listen to pious praise for the "progress" that women have made in these dangerous fields. A few years back, a NY Slimes article about the murder of NYC policewoman named Miosotis Familia made her death sound all so perfectly normal -- all just part of the job:

"And across the nation, women have pushed their way into policing’s most demanding jobs. To them, Officer Familia’s death was seen as a grim signifier of their growing front-line roles."
There are about 6,400 female officers on a force of just over 36,000 in dangerous New York City. That's almost 18%. The percentages in other cities that are even more dangerous are about the same and growing -- with more and more of them being killed "in the line of duty" every year. This is all part of the "progress" that "women's liberation" has brought to today's miserable, manified, modern woman. Thusly "liberated" from the "yoke" of marriage and traditional family life, the loony ladies now get to dress up in blue, carry a gun, chase bad guys through dark alleys, and then get killed -- often with their own gun. Marx & Trotsky would be pleased.

Years in the making --- comic book warrior characters like "Wonder Woman" (Image 1) and TV Shows like "Police Woman" (2) helped to subvert the proper nurturing of little girls. Image 3: Female fighter Rhonda Rousey --- a "role model."

A blast from the past, from that same article, about a big 1980's event which your New York metro-area high-school aged reporter here remembers very well:
"In the early 1980s, the New York City subways were forbidding, with robbers lurking in graffiti-covered cars. Very few women were on patrol, but Officer Irma Lozada took one of the most dangerous jobs: She hid her badge and draped fake gold chains around her neck, courting robbers to come after her in some of the most desperate parts of Brooklyn.

It was on one of these plainclothes assignments in 1984 when something went terribly wrong: Officer Lozada chased a suspect, got separated from her partner and was killed after the suspect wrested her service revolver from her and shot her twice."

She became the first female officer killed in New York City history. So jolted was the police force by her death that, in the aftermath, some officers spoke of women being better off reassigned to office jobs, several people recalled."

Yes indeed, you've come a long way, baby! How's it workin' out for ya?

In a healthy pre-Marxist society, dead officerettes Irma Lozada and Miosotis Familia would have been home cooking dinner for their husbands and checking the kids' homework

At least the reaction to the death of Officerette Lozada almost 4o years ago called into question the policy of putting policewomen on the front lines. In more contemporary times, as was the case with Officerette Familia -- who was shot and killed execution-style by an admitted cop-hater -- there is no longer any such debate. Rather than reassess this abominable practice of sending women off to fight criminals and enemy soldiers, the unisex Marxists act as if it's part of the normal course of business and continue to praise the "progress" that these misguided police-gals and Marine-ettes are making.

The societal perversion of cultural Marxism / libtardism offers oppression to women, not "liberation." How much happier, safer, and alive would Ms. Lozada, Ms. Familia and so many others had been if they were stay-at-home wives and mothers -- what Trotsky referred to as "slaves." Of course, given how the corresponding economic hands of Marxist taxation & the Fed's debt-currency racket make it increasingly impossible for a woman to stay home -- because a huge chunk of her husband's earnings (if she even has a husband), are taxed and inflated away -- these ladies are often forced to work. How hypocritically ironic it is that the Left condemns the Afghan Taliban for allegedly banning women from the workforce, as we here in the oh-so-enlightened West essentially, through economic policies, ban women from becoming traditional housewives!

This is "progress?" --- These "GI Janes" had their their limbs blown off in Iraq.

The warped ABUSE of women --- not "liberation."

Even when faced with the horrible murders and ghastly battlefield casualties of the fairer sex, very few of today's "men," especially those in the public realm, will dare to question the perverse policy of depriving strong men from so many police and firefighter jobs just so that mostly infertile women can take them, and get killed. Chivalry truly is dead -- as is sanity. Thanks Trotsky!

The Great One (that's Hitler for you all newbies and normies) had a few observations on this matter. And his truth, no matter how "old fashioned" it may seem to the modern libtard, will always be the truth.

Prior zeppelins had always been designed to stay float using helium -- a gas which is not flammable. At the time, however, helium was only available in industrial quantities from plants in the United States. Despite a U.S. ban on the export of helium under the Helium Control Act of 1927, the Germans designed the Hindenburg to use helium in the belief that the US government would license its export. But that assumption was made before FDR and his Jewish-Marxist gang took over America in 1933.


Some important background context....

1. Jewish pressure to destroy Germany began years before the actual second world war started. // 2. 1933. Daily Express (London): "Judea Declares War on Germany." // 3. 1933 / NY Daily News

When the designers learned that FDR's administration would not allow helium to be shipped to "Nazi" Germany, the Hindenberg was re-engineered to use hydrogen for its lift instead -- a gas which is flammable. The man responsible for denying helium to Germany was Secretary of the Interior Harold Ickes (cough cough) -- a fanatical German-hater and FDR Marxist. Though the German engineering geniuses were still able to construct a very safe airship -- because hydrogen was flammable -- there now existed an opportunity for an "accident" with a plausible "explanation" for it.

On May 6, 1937, at the very moment that the Hindenburg was docking before an awed crowd at Lakehurst, NJ, the grand airship burst into flames and crashed, killing 35 of the 97 passengers & crew. "Static electricity" was blamed, yet the Hindenburg had previously endured direct lightning hits! The true cause of the explosion remains unknown to this day. But the unusual amount of news reel cameras present that day, the helium embargo, the timing of the mysterious ignition just as the ship was mooring, the hyping of the idiotic "static electricity" theory, and the anti-German hysteria being whipped up by the press all combine to suggest that the Hindenburg disaster was actually an act of sabotage. Theories ranged from an on-board fanatic-bomber to an incendiary rifle-bullet fired from the nearby woods. The incident shattered confidence in Germany's zeppelins and marked the end of the airship era. How conveeenient.

And now, more than 80 years after dramatic killing the Hindenburg Airship, (((they))) are still out to kill Hindenburg's name -- even though the Marshall, being of an aristocratic background, was never actually a true supporter of Hitler's populist movement.

Paul von Hindenburg -- no longer to be honored.

1. A suspicious blast -- at the exact moment of mooring with the cameras filming -- destroys Germany's Airship industry. // 2. It was FDR's Jewish Secretary of the Interior, Harold Ickes, who would not permit helium exports to Germany. // 3. FDR with the mighty Ickes.

LIKE THIS PIECE? TIP THE WRITER AND EARN SPECIAL REWARD CONTENT ...

Tweet

E-Mail: GreatTomatoBubble2@Gmail.com

* If you like the free RH Chan items, you'll LOVE the 'donors only' stuff!

*************
AUTO-MONTHLY DONOR / SUBSCRIBER ($5 monthly min.) OR 1-TIME OPTIONS

YOU GET ALL 22 PDF BOOKS

PLUS the "almost-daily' Anti-NY Times
**************

TWO SIMPLE STEPS

*Allow a few daytime hours (USA EST time) to receive the pdf links.

STEP 2

CLICK IMAGE BELOW & SIGN UP AT "SUBSCRIBESTAR"

*****
For 1-Time Online Donation Option

(also with PDF rewards)

CLICK HERE

To send a check / MO or cash by mail: Payable to:
PASCAL PUBLICATIONS, P.O. BOX 804, SADDLE BROOK, NJ 07663

HOME
UPDATES & ARCHIVES
TOP OF PAGE